Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Rfp)
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Reason: Partisan/political stuff. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 04:22, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Please enforce WP:CT/AP. IanDBeacon (talk) 04:52, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The talk page for Gulf of Mexico is supposed to allow auto confirmed users to edit the Gulf of Mexico article. To ECP the talk page kills virtually any activity for the article page. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 05:24, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Nobody is proposing ECP here. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:42, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It looks like semi-protection is OK for now ... I'm not seeing a lot of reverting going on. Daniel Case (talk) 19:01, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: IP disruptively reverting/edit warring back to article rather than recent redirect of the article, despite the many problems brought up (by myself) regarding the article at Talk:List of Monster Jam episodes#Convert to redirect. IP has doing nothing to fix any of the issues brought up, whether any of the massive amount of unsourced content or downright incorrect information. Please let me know if this would preferred to be reported elsewhere, such as AIV, ANI, or AN3. Magitroopa (talk) 06:51, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated BLP violations. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:11, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Due to high traffic, requesting page to protected a bit longer to protect from disruptive IP edits. Imcdc Contact 07:23, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    hey.goodafternon.sorrry.i.im.daleyd over im trubolshoting 216.247.28.171 (talk) 08:09, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent disruptive edits and addition of unsourced content by IPs for a long time. Media Mender 📬✍🏻 08:17, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 08:28, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism again by various Indian IPs adding/replacing to their promotional website (bollywoodfever). Article already protected twice in January 2025, requesting for longer this time round. 🧧🍊 Paper9oll 🍊🧧 (🔔📝) 08:40, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated IP vandalism since the start of the year. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 09:03, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 11:27, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: I have continued to see this: anonymous users continued to add false information to this article such as unconfirmed cast members and composers. The Media Expert (talk) 13:08, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 (talk) 13:29, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Creation protected Actually only recreated once, but I have no high hopes that this won't be recreated again. Lectonar (talk) 14:25, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost nonstop vandalism, pending changes does not seem to be working. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:37, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mellk (talk) 14:02, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs appearing to change nationality. Mellk (talk) 14:04, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Naniwoofg. Borgenland (talk) 14:16, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Naniwoofg. Borgenland (talk) 14:16, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: This page requires better protection due to possible and expected vandalism, bot attacks and spread of misinformation. Please consider semi or fully protecting this page. Thank you! Sremsky (talk) 14:18, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Please enforce WP:CT/EE. IanDBeacon (talk) 18:49, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Director of a movie nominated for 13 Academy awards, and the movie is also very controversial. jolielover♥talk 15:13, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Government corruption and misinformation. Changing the leaders of the protests falsely to "Ustase" and blaming the protests on Croatia. The correct leaders of these protests are Students. The current president party is paying people to change the wiki page along with national television programs to lie and divide the people. Focus of the protests is demanding justice - regardless of the political party / current party in power.

    Please lock this page. 193.221.198.106 (talk) 15:51, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Untruthful edits made for the purpose of provoking the ones organizing the protests 188.90.120.19 (talk) 15:59, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 16:04, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Several IP users have been re-adding an unsourced, and possibly fabricated, political-party infobox to this article about a NYC neighborhood. Epicgenius (talk) 16:07, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IP 158.140.182.96 keeps vandalizing the page over many days DACartman (talk) 16:46, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ongoing and repeated IP vandalism and removal of cited content. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 17:15, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:CT/GG. Leonidlednev (TCL) 17:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS (vandal has also been indeffed). Daniel Case (talk) 19:05, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistant sockpuppetry, editor went by name User:Unklabwebmaster and now is going by the name User:LPM UNKLAB. Catfurball (talk) 17:37, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please consider a longer protection period. Aqurs1 (talk) 18:00, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – persistent unsourced number changes & other disruption by IPs. it's hard to verify the numbers because the Russian census is pretty inaccessible and difficult to navigate, but i think it's correct right now. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 18:01, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks keep re-adding hoax information about a nonexistent movie ("Looney Tunes: Let's Play School") to the article. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 18:28, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    Add that 80 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed since the “ceasefire” began (i.e. genocide direct deaths have continued albeit at a slower pace) https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/death-and-destruction-returning-to-rafah https://news.antiwar.com/2025/01/29/israeli-forces-have-killed-more-than-80-palestinians-in-gaza-since-ceasefire-went-into-effect/ Seahumidity (talk) 09:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Add info about 35 year reduction in life expectancy according to UPenn study http://www.thedp.com/article/2025/01/penn-study-gaza-life-expectancy-drop Seahumidity (talk) 10:53, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Create an article about the song "Loco" by Netón Vega. MC-123 (talk) 15:38, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @MC-123: Onus is generally on the person who wants the article to create it, not random editors on a noticeboard. If you think you have the sources to support an article, then see WP:WIZARD to get started. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I was going to create the article, but it seems that action is restricted to only administrators, template editors, and page movers, which is why I came here. MC-123 (talk) 17:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @MC-123: And which is why I pointed you at WP:WIZARD. Admins won't consider unprotecting a salted title without a good draft to put in its spot. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:11, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.